In our previous discussions of Antony Flew and William Kingdon Clifford, we've been exploring the evidentialist thesis in the philosophy of religion. Evidentialism is the view that we require evidence to ground our beliefs: belief in the absence of evidence is contrary to reason, perhaps even to morality. Confronted with this challenge, a person of faith can either accept the Continue Reading …
Episode 129: Is Faith Rational?
Nathan Gilmour (Christian Humanist podcast) and Pastor Rob Dyer join Mark and Wes for to discuss the reasonableness of religious belief reading: Antony Flew, "The Presumption of Atheism" (1976) Norwood Russell Hanson, “The Agnostic’s Dilemma” (1971) Steven Cahn, "The Irrelevance of Proof to Religion" (1969) Alvin Plantinga, “Is Belief in God Properly Basic?” Continue Reading …
Episode 129: Is Faith Rational? (Citizen Edition)
Nathan Gilmour (Christian Humanist podcast) and Pastor Rob Dyer join Mark and Wes for to discuss the reasonableness of religious belief reading Antony Flew, "The Presumption of Atheism" (1976); Norwood Russell Hanson, “The Agnostic’s Dilemma” (1971); Steven Cahn, "The Irrelevance of Proof to Religion" (1969); Alvin Plantinga, “Is Belief in God Properly Basic?” (1981); Merold Continue Reading …