• Manage Membership
  • Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Closereads
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Closereads
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List
  • Book

Ep. 393: Kant vs. Hegel (Part Two)

June 15, 2026 by Mark Linsenmayer 1 Comment

Subscribe to get parts 1 and 2 of this now, ad-free, plus tons of bonus content. Concluding our treatment of Ch. 2 of Hegel's Faith and Knowledge (1802). Having spent part one discussing Kant, now we're back to more knowledgably deal with Hegel's critique of him. Sponsors: Don’t get caught running yesterday’s security on today’s web: visit nordlayer.com/browser. Visit  Continue Reading …

Ep. 393: Kant vs. Hegel (Part Two for Supporters)

June 7, 2026 by Mark Linsenmayer

Concluding our treatment of Ch. 2 of Hegel's Faith and Knowledge (1802). Having spent part one discussing Kant, now we're back to more knowledgably deal with Hegel's critique of him. Hegel wants to connect Kant's idea in the Critique of Judgment of the "intuitive, archetypal intellect" that produces the objects given to its immediate consciousness, to the activity of the  Continue Reading …

Ep. 392: Early Hegel Elevates Reason (Part Two)

May 31, 2026 by Mark Linsenmayer Leave a Comment

Subscribe to get parts 1 and 2 of this now, ad-free, plus tons of bonus content. Continuing from part one on Faith and Knowledge (1802), Ch. 1 and 2. We start off by discussing how beauty might give us a window into things-in-themselves according to the Romantics, who were in part following Kant's lead. Also, what version of the ontological argument for the  Continue Reading …

Ep. 392: Early Hegel Elevates Reason (Part One)

May 25, 2026 by Mark Linsenmayer Leave a Comment

Subscribe to get parts 1 and 2 of this now, ad-free, plus tons of bonus content. On Faith and Knowledge (1802), Ch. 1 and 2. Famously, Kant critiqued Reason to effectively forbid theology and metaphysics, and a young G.W.F. Hegel was not happy about that. In this self-published essay written five years before the Phenomenology of Spirit, he argues against the  Continue Reading …

Ep. 392: Early Hegel Elevates Reason (Part Two for Supporters)

May 22, 2026 by Mark Linsenmayer

Continuing from part one on Faith and Knowledge (1802), Ch. 1 and 2. We start off by discussing how beauty might give us a window into things-in-themselves according to the Romantics, who were in part following Kant's lead. Also, what version of the ontological argument for the existence of God does Hegel believe, since he criticizes Kant for wrongly dismissing the  Continue Reading …

Ep. 392: Early Hegel Elevates Reason (Part One for Supporters)

May 22, 2026 by Mark Linsenmayer

On Faith and Knowledge (1802), Ch. 1 and 2. Famously, Kant critiqued Reason to effectively forbid theology and metaphysics, and a young G.W.F. Hegel was not happy about that. In this self-published essay written five years before the Phenomenology of Spirit, he argues against the impoverishment of Reason to mere intellect (i.e. the Kantian Understanding), restricted to realm of  Continue Reading …

Ep. 385: Guest Graham Harman on Object vs. Continuum (Part Two)

February 22, 2026 by Mark Linsenmayer Leave a Comment

Subscribe to get parts 1 and 2 of this now, ad-free, plus tons of bonus content. In our continuing Q&A with Graham, we engage him about Kantian Things-In-Themselves, complex things (that if divided, must be cut at the joints) vs. mere heaps, fact ontology, natural kinds, fictional objects, why philosophy is not knowledge, and philosophical style. Start with part one,  Continue Reading …

Ep. 385: Guest Graham Harman on Object vs. Continuum (Part One)

February 16, 2026 by Mark Linsenmayer Leave a Comment

Subscribe to get parts 1 and 2 of this now, ad-free, plus tons of bonus content. An interview with Graham in light of his new book, Waves and Stones: On the Ultimate Nature of Reality, which elaborates and adds to issues that the gang (Mark, Wes, Seth and Dylan) previously studied in Object-Oriented Ontology. We read chapters 1, 2, the conclusion of 9, and 10. Sponsors:  Continue Reading …

Ep. 385: Guest Graham Harman on Object vs. Continuum (Part Two for Supporters)

February 15, 2026 by Mark Linsenmayer

In our continuing Q&A with Graham, we engage him about Kantian Things-In-Themselves, complex things (that if divided, must be cut at the joints) vs. mere heaps, fact ontology, natural kinds, fictional objects, why philosophy is not knowledge, and philosophical style. Start with part one, or go back to ep. 384 where our Harman reading journey began. Next Episode: We'll be  Continue Reading …

Ep. 385: Guest Graham Harman on Object vs. Continuum (Part One for Supporters)

February 15, 2026 by Mark Linsenmayer

An interview with Graham in light of his new book, Waves and Stones: On the Ultimate Nature of Reality, which elaborates and adds to issues that the gang (Mark, Wes, Seth and Dylan) previously studied in Object-Oriented Ontology. We read chapters 1, 2, the conclusion of 9, and 10. What is the universe, fundamentally? We know that Graham is against reduction to fundamental  Continue Reading …

Ep. 384: Graham Harman’s Object-Oriented Ontology (Part Two)

February 2, 2026 by Mark Linsenmayer Leave a Comment

Subscribe to get parts 1, 2, and 3 of this now, ad-free, plus tons of bonus content. Continuing from part one on Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything (2018), finishing up ch. 1 (his introduction to the theory) and moving to ch. 4, "Indirect Relations," which is about causality. Sponsor: Get a $1/month e-commerce trial at shopify.com/pel. To clarify  Continue Reading …

Ep. 384: Graham Harman’s Object-Oriented Ontology (Part One)

January 25, 2026 by Mark Linsenmayer 1 Comment

Subscribe to get parts 1, 2, and 3 of this now, ad-free, plus tons of bonus content. On Harman's Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything (2018), ch. 1, 2, and 4. Featuring Mark, Wes, Dylan, and Seth. Sponsors: Get a $1/month e-commerce trial at shopify.com/pel. Go to HelloFresh.com/pel10fm to Get 10 free meals + a free Zwilling Knife with your third  Continue Reading …

Ep. 384: Graham Harman’s Object-Oriented Ontology (Part Two for Supporters)

January 25, 2026 by Mark Linsenmayer

Continuing from part one on Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything (2018), finishing up ch. 1 (his introduction to the theory) and moving to ch. 4, "Indirect Relations," which is about causality. To clarify Harman's objections to reductionism: He actually breaks this down into the idea of undermining, e.g. reducing everyday objects to their components, and a  Continue Reading …

Ep. 384: Graham Harman’s Object-Oriented Ontology (Part One for Supporters)

January 25, 2026 by Mark Linsenmayer

On Harman's Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything (2018), ch. 1, 2, and 4. Featuring Mark, Wes, Dylan, and Seth. What counts as an entity in the world? Harman's purpose in OOO is not, as it might seem by the name, to insist on the sole existence of physical objects, or even to rule out consideration of events as basic. He instead wants to broaden the concept  Continue Reading …

Ep. 378: Aquinas on God and Mind (Part One)

October 20, 2025 by Mark Linsenmayer Leave a Comment

Subscribe to get parts 1 and 2 of this now, ad-free, plus tons of bonus content. On selections from Thomas Aquinas: Selected Philosophical Writings, mostly taken from the Summa Theologica (1268). Featuring Mark, Wes, Seth, and Dylan. Given our flawed, finite human nature, how do we fit into the universe? In particular, how can we know and talk about things far beyond  Continue Reading …

Ep. 378: Aquinas on God and Mind (Part One for Supporters)

October 19, 2025 by Mark Linsenmayer

On selections from Thomas Aquinas: Selected Philosophical Writings, mostly taken from the Summa Theologica (1268). Featuring Mark, Wes, Seth, and Dylan. Given our flawed, finite human nature, how do we fit into the universe? In particular, how can we know and talk about things far beyond our experience such as God and eternity? Or maybe we just can't? Aquinas is writing  Continue Reading …

Ep. 357: Feuerbach on the Evolution of Philosophy (Part Three for Supporters)

December 20, 2024 by Mark Linsenmayer

A week after our final public discussion of Feuerbach’s “Principles of the Philosophy of the Future," Mark, Wes, and a re-joining Seth met to talk about sections 23-28 of the essay, which detail Feuerbach's case against Hegel. Interestingly, F argues that Hegel's treatment of everything, including God, as Idea is given right in the ontological argument: If God's existence is  Continue Reading …

Closereads: F.H. Bradley’s “Appearance and Reality” (Part One)

October 11, 2024 by Mark Linsenmayer

Sign up for Closereads at patreon.com/closereadsphilosophy to get future parts on this reading, as well as our previous and future installments of this podcast. Bradley was a prominent British Hegelian, best known now for being the springboard for Bertrand Russell, who was initially a follower but then rejected idealism entirely to co-create what is now known as analytic  Continue Reading …

Ep. 350: Rorty on Justification and Essentialism (Part One)

September 16, 2024 by Mark Linsenmayer 2 Comments

Subscribe to get parts 1 and 2 of this now, ad-free, plus tons of bonus content. On "Universality and Truth" and "Pan-Relationalism," which are lectures 3-5 in Richard Rorty's Pragmatism As Anti-Authoritarianism, which we began discussing last episode. Mark, Wes, Seth, and Dylan continue to hash through Rorty's pragmatism, which in this book is given in relation to how  Continue Reading …

Ep. 350: Rorty on Justification and Essentialism (Part One for Supporters)

September 13, 2024 by Mark Linsenmayer

On "Universality and Truth" and "Pan-Relationalism," which are lectures 3-5 in Richard Rorty's Pragmatism As Anti-Authoritarianism, which we began discussing last episode. Mark, Wes, Seth, and Dylan continue to hash through Rorty's pragmatism, which in this book is given in relation to how to best promote democracy. Rorty thinks democracy can "stand on its own two feet"; it  Continue Reading …

Next Page »

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

This field is required.
Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Recent Comments

  • David on Ep. 398: Donald Davidson on Mind vs. Body (Part Two)
  • Fred Adler on Ep. 398: Donald Davidson on Mind vs. Body (Part One)
  • dmf on Ep. 398: Donald Davidson on Mind vs. Body (Part One)
  • Win Corduan on Topic for #36: More Hegel on Self-Consciousness (Plus Win Corduan on Hegel)
  • Ian K on Ep. 397: Federalist Papers LIVE (Part One)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

PEL Citizens have access to all podcast episodes, free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Closereads
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2026 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2026 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.