• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Stokely Carmichael’s Sartrean Influences

March 26, 2012 by Daniel Horne 3 Comments

One of the names dropped during the Race and Philosophy episode was that of Stokely Carmichael. Below is a famous recording of one Carmichael’s “Black Power” speeches, given after Carmichael was appointed Chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, or SNCC:

Watch on YouTube.

Some quick historical context: This speech was Carmichael’s response to criticism of the new direction he was taking SNCC; to wit, spurning its previously interracial makeup, and turning SNCC into an organization exclusively of, by, and for “black people.”

Some of the allusions Carmichael makes in the speech to Camus, Sartre, and Fanon might initially seem to add little intellectually to its core message. But in fact, Carmichael’s argument mined solid elements from at least two Sartre essays, Black Orpheusand Anti-Semite and Jew.It was in Black Orpheus where Sartre first coined the term “anti-racist racism” to explain “negritude” as a natural Hegelian negation by African peoples against their European oppressors. And in Anti-Semite and Jew, Sartre argued that European Jews could never expect to integrate into European society without living inauthentically (which, yes, is one of those overdramatic technical existentialist terms Mark spoofed on the episode). For Sartre, integration and Jewish authenticity were incompatible, given the choice of European Jewry between (1) anti-Semites, who would go so far as to define Jews into existence, only to destroy them, so as to conquer their fear of modernity, and (2) “democrats” who would assimilate and therefore negate Jews existentially, so as to claim they had conquered anti-Semitism in defense of Enlightenment ideals.

So, yes, Carmichael’s speech can and should be appreciated on its own terms as a rhetorical tour de force. Even so, highlighting its Sartrean kernels may add context to the important, if troubling, philosophical question it poses.

-Daniel Horne

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Things to Watch Tagged With: existentialism, Jean-Paul Sartre, philosophy blog, political philosophy, Race, Stokely Carmichael

Comments

  1. dmf says

    March 26, 2012 at 12:39 pm

    nice, Angela Davis was also highly influenced by Sartre, Camus, and of course Marcuse. does anyone know if she ever did any work on Foucault and imprisonment?

    Reply
  2. Law Ware Twitter: @law_ware says

    March 26, 2012 at 8:54 pm

    One can certainly see the influence of Foucault in her book ‘Are Prisons Obsolete?’ However, it has been so long since I’ve read it that I cannot remember if she cites him directly.

    Great post, Daniel.

    Reply
    • Daniel Horne says

      March 26, 2012 at 10:44 pm

      Thanks, Law. You were a great guest, and I look forward to you returning for another episode.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Larry Young on Ep. 310: Wittgenstein On World-Pictures (Part One)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap April 2022
  • Wes Alwan on Ep. 305: Cormac McCarthy’s “Blood Meridian” (Part Three for Supporters)
  • Wes Alwan on Ep. 305: Cormac McCarthy’s “Blood Meridian” (Part Three for Supporters)
  • Wes Alwan on Ep. 306: Dworkin and the Dobbs Decision (Part Three for Supporters)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in