• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Critical Voter

June 21, 2016 by Jonathan Haber 4 Comments

During the last Presidential election, I noticed a trend in philosophy columns, like one I was enjoying in the New York Times, where philosophical concepts and arguments were brought to bear on political opinions that seemed already set in Stone (sorry about that).

For instance, when the President fumbled during the first debate in 2012 (which shocked many, given Obama’s reputation as a superb orator vs. his supposedly ungifted rival), much of the media seemed to have settled on an explanation that Mitt Romney was a master of factual knowledge which he used to his advantage during that first encounter.

Naturally, the President’s allies and supporters used time-tested (and perfectly legitimate) strategies to try to turn an alleged strength of an opponent into a negative (by claiming Romney was trying to hoodwink the public by overwhelming them with wonky recitations of facts, many of which could not be trusted).

But a number of writers seemed to go one step further, questioning whether facts actually existed, or at least whether anyone was in a position to judge truth from falsehood with regard to factual knowledge in a world of so much complexity, competing narratives, and endlessly expanding channels of communication.

While I was unaware of the scale of epistemic risk associated with declaring that fact might no longer be real (having not started my philosophy crash course until the election was over), I was involved with a project at the time that did get me questioning whether we needed to make such a leap quite so quickly.

That project was called Critical Voter (now a book) and consisted of a free curriculum anchored with a set of podcast lectures that I had originally developed to teach my own children the importance of logic, rhetoric, cognitive science, media, and Information Literacy and other tools that fell into my own quixotic definition of “Practical Critical Thinking.”

The series ran in parallel with the 2012 Presidential campaign and included guest speakers (including the editor of that aforementioned NYT Stone column). And, even with my limited philosophical experience at the time, it seemed as though anchoring an argument in first principles (i.e., the philosopher’s mental toolkit, which made up a bulk of the Critical Voter curriculum) pointed toward reasonable theories regarding what was going on that did not require first jettisoning reality.

For instance, if you looked at that election in the context of Aristotle’s Modes of Persuasion, Mitt Romney was clearly more gifted in logos, while the President’s oratory relied more on emotion (pathos) and connection (ethos). This meant that televised debates (which don’t allow opportunities for the kind of rhetoric Obama did so well in front of large audiences), simply provided Romney the chance to play to his strengths.

With regard to cognitive science principles, arguments that followed the debate (such as Republican claims that Obama had shown himself to be an “empty suit,” or Democrat accusations that Romney was a liar whose “facts” couldn’t be trusted) were simply attempts to get our story-loving fast process to assimilate a preferred narrative before the other side’s desired story line sunk into public consciousness.

This year’s bizarre election might confirm that we are entering a post-factual age, or that some other major cognitive or political transformation is happening to our species or polity. But before jumping to such a conclusion, perhaps it’s worth looking at today’s scorched political landscape based on similar first principles.

 –Jonathan Haber is an educational researcher whose Degree of Freedom website describes his attempt to replicate (l)earning a BA in philosophy in one year. He is the author of MOOCS: The Essential Guide from MIT Press and Critical Voter: How to Use the Next Election to Make Yourself and Your Kids Smarter. He is currently helping to build a new graduate school of education.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Misc. Philosophical Musings Tagged With: Aristotle, critical thinking, election, politics

Comments

  1. Evan Hadkins says

    June 21, 2016 at 7:29 pm

    Would you like to say more about what you are doing with the new graduate school of education Jonathan?; I’d be very interested to hear.

    Reply
    • Jonathan Haber says

      June 23, 2016 at 9:11 pm

      Sure. Not open for business yet, but here’s the web site for the project: http://woodrowacademy.org/

      Reply
      • Evan Hadkins says

        June 23, 2016 at 9:27 pm

        Thanks

        Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Fixing Our Beliefs | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    June 28, 2016 at 7:01 am

    […] I turned that Critical Voter curriculum mentioned last time into a book [which PEL readers can get free from Amazon every Tuesday between now and July 19], the […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Jason Engelund on Ep. 318: Friedrich Schiller on the Civilizing Potential of Art (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Eric on Ep. 318: Friedrich Schiller on the Civilizing Potential of Art (Part One)
  • Vincent Czyz on Lucifer: How a Decent Deity Got a Bad Rap (Part 1)
  • Matt Kuenning on Ep. 310: Wittgenstein On World-Pictures (Part Two)
  • Sean Fournier on Not Episode 69: PEL Players Full Cast Audiobook of Plato’s “Gorgias” (part 1)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in