• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • (sub)Text
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

PREVIEW-Episode 33: Montaigne: What Is the Purpose of Philosophy?

February 18, 2011 by Mark Linsenmayer 21 Comments

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PREVIEW-PEL_ep_033_2-3-11.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 32:19 — 29.7MB)

This is a 32-minute preview of a 1 hr, 41-minute episode.

Buy Now Purchase this episode for $2.99. Or become a PEL Citizen for $5 a month, and get access to this and all other paywalled episodes, including 68 back catalogue episodes; exclusive Part 2's for episodes published after September, 2020; and our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally.

Discussing Michel de Montaigne's Essays: "That to Philosophize is to Learn to Die," "Of Experience," "Of Cannibals," "Of the Education of Children," and "Of Solitude" (all from around 1580) with some discussion of "Apology for Raymond Sebond."

Renaissance man Montaigne tells us all how to live, how to die, how to raise our kids, that we don't know anything, and a million Latin quotations. Montaigne put the skeptical fire under Descartes and both draws upon and mocks a great deal of ancient Greek and Roman philosophy. Plus, he's actually fun to read.

The role of Seth is played this time by our guest podcaster Dylan Casey.

Read along here; the translation we all read is available for purchase.

End song: "I Like Life" from Mark Lint and the Fake Johnson Trio (1998)

Looking for the full Citizen version?

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: Michel de Montaigne, philosophy podcast, Renaissance, skepticism, Stoicism, the good life

Comments

  1. Burl says

    February 19, 2011 at 9:27 am

    lol…fun episode

    Reply
  2. Matthew says

    February 19, 2011 at 11:20 am

    Have you considered doing a podcast on Pascal?

    Reply
  3. Getty Lustila says

    February 19, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    Great episode. Just a couple of positive pointers:

    Wes’ background on Pyrrhonism was right on the mark. Often this sort of skepticism gets a bad name for itself–conjuring images of ‘external world’ skeptics walking into walls or pits; forcing their followers to redirect them. Montaigne addresses these worries quite specifically in the Sebond essay:

    “Where Morals are concerned, they conform to the common mould. They find it appropriate to yield to natural inclination, to the thrust and constraints of their emotions, to established laws and customs and to the traditional arts…This is why I cannot square with these conceptions what is told about Pyrrho himself. They describe him as emotionless and virtually senseless, adopting a wild way of life, cut off from society, allowing himself to be bumped into by wagons [etc.]…That goes well beyond his teaching. He was not fashioning a log or a stone but a living, arguing, thinking man, enjoying natural pleasuers and comforts of every sort and making full use of his parts, bodily as well as spiritual” (p. 563; Screech translation of the Complete Essays)

    Skepticism is much more interesting and palatable in its Ancient forms than it is among its most modern practitioners (from Descartes->Stroud)

    The Nietzsche connection was equally interesting and important. Dr. Berry argues in her “Nietzsche and the Ancient Skeptical Tradition” that you can get Nietzsche to Pyrrhonism (her goal) through Montaigne. There are of course some issues with it, but at the end of the day it seems quite compelling. The idea of a ‘Gay Science’ stands in contrast to a Wissenschaft throughout Nietzsche’s writings. Then we can throw out all the sketchy debates about his ‘epistemology’ too.

    One big question, which was touched on briefly, is ‘what role is religion playing in Montaigne’. I have no reason to doubt he is quite serious about his Catholicism, but it is difficult to see what role revelation seems to be playing in his thought. It better not be saying it is a form of knowledge!

    Anyway, keep it up. I’m looking forward to the Frege episode.

    Reply
  4. Wes Alwan says

    February 19, 2011 at 2:52 pm

    Thanks Getty — I was working with some very ancient recollections.

    You may know that we were classmates of Dr. Berry at U.T., and I have the same interest strong interest in Skepticism in Nietzsche (stimulated in part by Brian Leiter and the fact that there was a lot going on regarding skepticism at the time in the ancient philosophy program). You’ve probably heard of Maudmarie Clarke’s “Nietzsche on Truth and Knowledge,” which makes him out to be something of a neo-Kantian skeptic epistemologically; if not, you should check it out.

    Reply
  5. Mark Linsenmayer says

    February 20, 2011 at 12:11 pm

    @Matthew: “Pascal’s Wager” (all 2 pages of it) will likely be a topic on some near-term “arguments for the existence of God” podcast, though I wouldn’t hold your breath.

    I’ve never read anything else by him; maybe Wes can speak to that. If you have any specific suggestions re. what tack to take on a Pascal episode, I’d be glad to hear it.

    -Mark

    Reply
  6. Nathan says

    February 20, 2011 at 8:15 pm

    Screw Pascal… go for the Existential wager made by Jean Paul Sartre and review Being and Nothingness in a 2+ part episode (only cover more than bad faith and being for others like most do– his conception of transcendence, thoughts on solipsism, pre-reflective/ reflective consciousness, time, metaphysics etc..).

    you could probably work Pascal into an episode on Sartre anyway, considering he offers an alternative to religion and Being and Nothingness was banned by the Catholic Church.

    Reply
  7. Getty Lustila says

    February 20, 2011 at 8:47 pm

    @Wes
    It sounds like UT-Austin was the place to be at that time. I have heard some of Jim Hankinson’s stuff too; very interesting.

    I have been meaning to get around to that Clarke book for some time now. I know it is quite the classic! I guess I have been unconsciously avoiding it for some reason or another.

    @Mark
    Pascal is super interesting. As Nietzsche brutally noted:

    “I don’t read but love Pascal, as the most instructive victim of Christianity, murdered slowly, first physically and then psychologically – the whole logic of this gruesome form of inhuman cruelty”

    It isn’t like you guys don’t already have enough on your plate!

    Reply
  8. Burl says

    February 21, 2011 at 10:08 am

    Philosopher Irwin likes to write on how philosophy can give iseas on how to live, live well, and live better (what Whitehead identifies as the sole function of reason)

    Like Montaign, Irwin likes the Stoics.

    His book on Desire was spectacular – a lot of affective neuroscience, and a lot of philosophical schools of thought on how to handle desire.

    http://www.wright.edu/~william.irvine/wbi/wbi-index.html

    Reply
  9. Burl says

    February 21, 2011 at 10:29 am

    Correction – Irvine. He has a good podcast interview on Stoics on the site.

    Reply
  10. Alex says

    February 24, 2011 at 3:47 pm

    In case you do want your kids to wake up/sleep to some Led Zeppelin, there is Rockabye Baby’s album full of lullaby versions of Zeppelin songs. http://amzn.com/B000IFSFY0

    Reply
  11. Wes Alwan says

    March 1, 2011 at 1:21 am

    @Alex — fantastic, thanks.

    Reply
  12. Tom McDonald says

    March 14, 2011 at 4:08 pm

    Philosopher Kwame Anthony Appiah calls Montaigne “the first liberal” in a March 2011 article on Slate.com:

    http://www.slate.com/id/2287982/

    Cheers,
    Tom

    Reply
  13. Andrew in Oz says

    August 25, 2011 at 7:02 pm

    Perhaps Montaigne was aquianted with Diogenes?

    Diogenes was asked, “What is the difference between life and death?

    “No difference.”

    “Well then, why do you remain in this life?”

    “Because there is no difference.”

    Reply
  14. Nitpicker says

    July 22, 2013 at 4:30 am

    Just how many essays on solitude have you read?!

    [Discussing Michel de Montaigne’s Essays: “That to Philosophize is to Learn to Die,” “Of Experience,” “Of Cannibals,” “Of the Education of Children,” “Of Solitude,” and “Of Solitude” (all from around 1580) with some discussion of “Apology for Raymond Sebond.”]

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. In Memoriam: Christopher Hitchens | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    December 16, 2011 at 11:52 pm

    […] like Montaigne, Hitchens was not a philosopher, but rather a polymath essayist of rare skill, whose gifts […]

    Reply
  2. PEL Gets Reviewed by Podthoughts (Colin Marshall) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    January 2, 2012 at 11:42 pm

    […] podcast. Listen to him interview Sarah Bakewell about Montaigne. (After, of course, listening to our Montaigne episode; plus, here’s a past post on […]

    Reply
  3. Topic for #62: Voltaire’s Novel “Candide” | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    July 31, 2012 at 11:14 pm

    […] he was a favorite of Nietzsche. He’s also in the Phyrronian skeptical tradition, following Montaigne. Quoting from the Stanford Encyclopedia on his views in this respect: Among the philosophical […]

    Reply
  4. Filosofiska klassiker uppfräschade av fyra amerikaner | bookfetishist says:
    April 23, 2013 at 3:50 pm

    […] 2.   Michel Montaignes “Essayer” […]

    Reply
  5. Why can’t life always be beautiful? | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    June 17, 2013 at 9:41 am

    […] convoluted for summary explanation, but basically he assumes that (I’m very much reminded of Michel de Montaigne here) the arts serve as a sort of moderation of pleasures that keep the whims of wild hedonism at […]

    Reply
  6. Why can’t life always be beautiful? - Ulta Din says:
    February 9, 2016 at 4:15 am

    […] convoluted for summary explanation, but basically he assumes that (I’m very much reminded of Michel de Montaigne here) the arts serve as a sort of moderation of pleasures that keep the whims of wild hedonism at […]

    Reply
  7. Science, Religion, and Secularism Part IX: Did Heliocentrism Knock Humanity Off Its Perch? | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    November 9, 2017 at 7:01 am

    […] [sixteenth century philosopher, Michel] Montaigne, still adhering to the older astronomy, could consistently describe man's dwelling-place as 'the […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Jennifer Tejada on PEL Nightcap Early April 2021
  • Jennifer Tejada on PEL Nightcap Early April 2021
  • Mark Linsenmayer on PEL Nightcap Early April 2021
  • Mark Linsenmayer on PEL Nightcap Early April 2021
  • Mark Linsenmayer on PEL Nightcap Early April 2021

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2021 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in