• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Topic for #61: Nietzsche on Truth

July 15, 2012 by Mark Linsenmayer 14 Comments


Listen to the episode.

We discussed Nietzsche's conception of truth as presented in his essay "On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense," written in 1873 but unpublished until after his death with guest Jessica Berry of Georgia State University, who published Nietzsche and the Ancient Skeptical Tradition just last year.

This Nietzsche essay has been extremely influential for postmodernists, and argues that truth is:

A mobile army of metaphors, metonyms, and anthropomorphisms—in short, a sum of human relations which have been enhanced, transposed, and embellished poetically and rhetorically, and which after long use seem firm, canonical, and obligatory to a people: truths are illusions about which one has forgotten that this is what they are; metaphors which are worn out and without sensuous power; coins which have lost their pictures and now matter only as metal, no longer as coins.

More radical on the face of it that the pragmatist conception of truth, by which "the true" is in some way defined as what is useful for human endeavor, it sounds like Nietzsche is denying that truth exists at all. But why should we take Nietzsche's claim seriously if it's not itself true?

Jessica had pretty much no tolerance for this whole line of interpreting Nietzsche. Based on close reading of the text and familiarity with Nietzsche's other work, it's far more reasonable to see him as a believer in truth but a skeptic about the dogmatic claims of metaphysicians. His concern is not to give a theory of truth at all, but to analyze where this "will to truth" that philosophers value so highly might come from. In keeping with his later analysis of this will to truth in the Genealogy of Morals, he sees the philosopher's monomainia regarding truth as a form of asceticism, of life-hating self-denial. First off, illusions are not always bad for us, and may in fact be necessary for the continued well-functioning of society. More importantly, the urge towards truth when taken to extremes (or maybe even to just its natural end point given the way we normally use the term) becomes a will towards acquiring something that due to our knowledge capabilities simply impossible: we want pure facts, unmediated by our own faculties. In this, Nietzsche's epistemology is the same as Schopenhauer's and Kant's: there's a distinction between the thing-in-itself and the world of appearance, and the latter, which is all we can know, inevitably bears the traces of our own psychology, our own interests. (For more discussion of the pragmatic conception of truth, listen to our episodes on William James: part 1 and part 2.)

As an optional source to help sort through the various scholarly interpretations of Nietzsche, you might want to look at Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy by Maudemarie Clark, which has a whole chapter on it (chapter 3) devoted to this essay; I see someone has posted it here).

Buy a book with a good translation of Nietzsche's essay in it or read the essay online.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: General Announcements Tagged With: epistemology, Friedrich Nietzsche, philosophy podcast, pragmatism, skepticism, truth, will to truth

Comments

  1. Justin Boyd says

    July 15, 2012 at 1:37 pm

    Nietzsche’s proto-deconstruction of ‘truth’ in this essay is exemplary of his claim from The Will to Power that “the highest values devalue themselves.” He does *not* say “we devalue society’s highest values form our view from nowhere,” but rather, essentially, that the values themselves (the rules of the game, so to speak), if self-reflected, disintegrate.

    I don’t think that Nietzsche wants to ground his criticisms in ‘Truth’ (i.e. in some deeper truth from which we could attack conventional ‘truth’), but rather to self-consciously use the tools of our anthropocentric truth-game against themselves. For him, as you quote above, “truths are illusions which we have forgotten are illusions” – but the point of his attempt to remind us of this is not to escape the illusions (which would be impossible for human beings), but rather to be conscious of their illusory nature, thus opening up the possibility of the creation of new values.

    So my response to the criticism that the Nietzschean deconstruction of truth is akin to one sawing off a tree branch upon which one is sitting would be: yeah, that’s exactly right – except that the tree never had any roots to begin with, and we were in free-fall all along.

    Reply
  2. Gary Chapin says

    July 16, 2012 at 8:19 am

    “But why should we take Nietzsche’s claim seriously if it’s not itself true?”

    And

    “So my response to the criticism that the Nietzschean deconstruction of truth is akin to one sawing off a tree branch upon which one is sitting would be: yeah, that’s exactly right – except that the tree never had any roots to begin with, and we were in free-fall all along.” (That’s really good.)

    This seems to me a classic statement of the philosophically suicidal nature of radical skepticism. I used to dismiss this as a quibble — an artifact reflecting that language can tie itself in knots, something to win dorm room arguments with — but now I’m very curious to know if anyone’s addressed this who has not resorted to metaphysics.

    Reply
  3. dmf says

    July 16, 2012 at 9:05 am

    http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/d/dickstein-pragmatism.html
    “Berthelot was probably the first to call Nietzsche “a German pragmatist,” and the first to emphasize the resemblance between Nietzsche’s perspectivism and the pragmatist theory of truth. This resemblance–frequently noted since, notably in a seminal chapter of Arthur Danto’s book on Nietzsche–is most evident in the The Gay Science. There Nietzsche says “We do not even have any organ at all for knowing, for `truth’; we `know’ … just as much as may be useful in the interest of the human herd.” This Darwinian view lies behind James’ claim that “thinking is for the sake of behavior” and his identification of truth as “the good in the way of belief.”
    That identification amounts to accepting Nietzsche’s claim that human beings should be viewed, for epistemological purposes, as what Nietzsche called “clever animals.” Beliefs are to be judged solely by their utility in fulfilling these animals’ varied needs. James and Nietzsche did for the word “true” what John Stuart Mill had done for the word “right.” Just as Mill says that there is no ethical motive apart from the desire for the happiness of human beings, so James and Nietzsche say that there is no will to truth distinct from the will to happiness. All three philosophers think that the terms “true” and “right” gain their meaning from their use in evaluating the relative success of efforts to achieve happiness. “

    Reply
  4. Evan says

    July 16, 2012 at 1:41 pm

    I’d love to hear you guys incorporate some discussion of book three of the genealogy of morals, especially its thoughts on the nature of the will to truth. I think it has a lot to say about what Nietzsche has in mind when he suggests that truth is self undermining. Its also one of my favorite works of his, so there’s that too.

    Reply
  5. Francis says

    July 23, 2012 at 10:35 pm

    It’d be Very interesting to at some point hear discussion of contemporary Nietzsche commentators and how their interpretations contrast.. -particularly Brian Leiter and Alexander Nehamas…
    But also then also going back a bit to Heidegger, latter on Rorty and of course all those 20th century Frenchmen.

    Reply
  6. Chris Mullen says

    July 31, 2012 at 10:48 pm

    I would also suggest another essay on this topic entitled, “Perspectivism and Truth in Nietzsche’s Philosophy: A Critical Look at the Apparent Contradiction as a brief supplement.

    Reply
  7. Chris Mullen says

    July 31, 2012 at 10:55 pm

    Yet another essay for you consideration, “Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil: ‘Why insist on the truth?’.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Truth and Lie in Gulliver’s Travels | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    July 24, 2012 at 1:30 am

    […] a defense of enlightenment ideals but a critique, with a subtle defense of untruth reminiscent of Nietzsche : In Gulliver’s Travels, Swift challenges the idea — advanced by his Enlightenment […]

    Reply
  2. Weekly Annotations Round-up (weekly) | Creative Destruction says:
    July 28, 2012 at 8:52 pm

    […] Topic for #61: Nietzsche on Truth | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Po… […]

    Reply
  3. Evolutionary Psychology’s Pseudo-Explanations of Art and Culture | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    July 31, 2012 at 12:20 pm

    […] flourishing rather than mere necessity is the overriding motivation. Or to quote Nietzsche from On Truth and Lie in the Extra-Moral Sense: “neither the hose, nor the gait, nor the clothes, nor the clay jugs give evidence of having […]

    Reply
  4. Nietzsche and the “Death of God.” | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    August 9, 2012 at 9:18 am

    […] anticipation of the upcoming episode on Nietzsche, I submit the following discussion by The Big Ideas podcast concerning Nietsche’s famous but […]

    Reply
  5. A Brief Guide to Nietzsche’s “On Truth and Lie in the Extra-Moral Sense” | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    August 9, 2012 at 3:48 pm

    […] our upcoming episode on Nietzsche’s On Truth and Lie in the Extra-Moral Sense, I’ve created a guide that you’ll find […]

    Reply
  6. The Illusion of Control | About Questioning and Skepticism says:
    May 2, 2015 at 9:46 am

    […] 1Linsenmayer, Mark (15 July 2012) Nietzsche on Truth. http://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2012/07/15/topic61/ […]

    Reply
  7. Partially Examined Life Ep. 61: Nietzsche on Truth | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    August 28, 2015 at 10:21 am

    […] Read more on the topic and buy the book. Wes has also created a guide to this episode that you can purchase here. You can also purchase a transcription of this episode (and read a big chunk of it for free). […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • Wayne Barr on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in